Product liability cases are unique among personal injury cases in that they generally bring into play the doctrine of strict liability. The activities the defendant engages in are those of great risk, despite a level of utmost care. Related strict liability principles also may apply to products liability and even certain crimes. Liability for destruction of a fence is similar to the liability incurred for acts against anothers property. Although strict liability mainly applies to product defect cases or other personal injury cases in the civil arena, it is occasionally part of criminal cases as well. Since the issue of strict liability is so significant to our cause, narsols board of directors unanimously voted to expend funds to prepare an amicus brief in support of may. Sep 22, 2010 by now, we all have some idea what the legal term, strict liability means. Almost all cases of civil or criminal liability have some form of intent component. The imposition of strict liability may operate very unfairly in individual cases.
For example, in pharmaceutical society of great britain v storkwain, 1 a pharmacist supplied drugs to a patient who presented a forged doctors prescription, but was convicted even though the house of lords accepted that the pharmacist was blameless. Strict liability is a legal term which means that the individual or company is held liable for any damages or death caused, regardless of intent or negligence on the part of the consumer. A plea that a destroyed fence has been replaced by another fence will not relieve a tortfeasor from hisher civil liabilityi. A domesticated dog owned by cindy batteen bit plaintiff. That offence had been treated as one of strict liability and the. Normally in personal injury cases, it is necessary to demonstrate that a specific act of negligence on the part of the defendant caused the injury to the plaintiff, thereby leading the plaintiff to file a. Mar, 2016 strict liability is a legal term referring to the holding of an individual or entity liable for damages or losses, without having to prove carelessness or mistake. Fencing iphone cases and covers are available in soft, skin, snap, tough, and wallet styles. It was held that it was not necessary to consider whether the. This is an introductory lesson in the tort theory of strict liability. Boundary fences are one of the major causes of property disputes.
In many cases involving strict liability, a defendant is required to pay damages to the plaintiff because of their violation of a law, even if the defendant was not negligent in their actions or had any intent to cause harm to the plaintiff. A plaintiff filing a personal injury lawsuit under strict liability does not need to show intentional or negligent conduct, only that the defendants action. In other words, you will not get in trouble if a criminal. The case against strict liability alan schwartz professor schwartz identifies the foundational assumptions of strict products liability law, and argues that these assumptions are either false. A person can still harbor dogs, and be strictly liable for dog attacks, even if that person does not reside where the dogs are kept, an appeals court has ruled in a case that chills a parents decision to purchase a home for dogowning children. To obtain a conviction for a strict liability crime, the state need only prove that the defendant committed the prohibited act. Powers, the persistence of fault in products liability, 61 tex. Strict liability is the law in other areas in other areas the law requires a greater burden of those in a greater position of power to protect the more vulnerable.
Florida strict liability law governs wrongful death law. The doctrine of strict liability is commonly applied to cases involving defective products. On may 2, 2014, a oneday bench trial took place in the district court before judge w. The divisional court interpreted s as creating an offence of. For example, you cannot steal from someone unless there is a showing you intended to wrongly deprive another of their property. Here, the police only need to prove that a motorist committed a traffic offence at a specific place and time despite the rulings marked on the road or pavements.
Understanding the courts use of strict liability tort. Dec 26, 2019 in nuisance cases involving strict liability, the defendants actions are not those of an ordinary person. Today, most states recognize some version of strict products liability. Narsol fighting strict liability case in ninth circuit. The offence is one of strict liability as the defendant had to. Recent strict liability case contains important lesson for. Negligence is when someone suffers and injury because of anothers failure to live up to a required duty of care. Such a claim relies, not on wrongdoing, but on the inherent hazards of the situation or product. Typical strict liability cases one example of a strict liability offence is speeding. Posted by andrew on may 5, 2011 in strict liability, torts 0 comments. In this short paper, i shall answer the titles question first in the context of criminal law and then in the context of tort law.
The activities the defendant engages in are those of. Under strict liability, those who suffer injuries due to defective products can file suit without having to prove negligence. Thirteen consumers have filed a lawsuit in washington d. In strict liability situations, although the plaintiff does not have to prove fault, the defendant can raise a defense of absence of fault, especially in cases of product liability, where the defense may argue that the defect was the result of the plaintiffs actions and not of the product, that is, no inference of defect should be drawn solely. Cs superior court that may shed light on the cell phone industrys alleged coverup regarding the dangers of exposure to cellphone radiation and may prove to be the next big wave of product liability litigation. The liability of owners under the dividing fences act should be limited to half the. The case was referred to the hol on two points, the first was whether the fact that the offence was one of strict liability, violated article 61. Strict liability in criminal cases tulsa attorneys 918. The desired approach is not to follow the law strictly, in the first. The divisional court interpreted s as creating an offence of strict liability since it was itself silent as to mens rea, whereas other offences under the same act expressly required proof of knowledge on the part of. Strict liability in criminal cases exist in oklahoma. Many residents dont realize that florida is a strict product liability state. Octrine 19751978 the massachusetts judges who decided the first products liabil ity cases after the implied warranty of merchantability was amended between 1971 and 1974 began their construction of the strict liability doctrine with an understanding.
Plaintiffs routinely assert strict liability claims along with other tort claims and contract claims when filing a product liability lawsuit. In that latter section i shall also mention in passing contractual and other forms of civil liability that are strict, although they will not be my principal focus. The justification in this case is that the misuse of drugs is a grave social evil and pharmacists should be encouraged to take even unreasonable care to verify prescriptions before. A plea that a destroyed fence has been replaced by another fence. The d in the case had only been 15 at the time, and the victim admitted that shed earlier lied to him about her age. The trial court, without specifying which theory of negligence it chose to rely on. With strict liability crimes, the prosecutions case is easier. Plaintiffs routinely assert strict liability claims along with other tort claims and. Beginning in the 1950s and 1960s, courts and legislatures nationwide began rendering decisions and passing laws giving greater protection to consumers over manufacturing interests.
Strict liability makes a defendant liable for harm caused by their products or activities regardless of fault. The doctrine is the natural outgrowth of justice cardozos perceptive and justifiably acclaimed opinion in macpherson v. Garibaldi introduction t he doctrine of strict liability in tort has arisen to meet the needs of present day economic, social and moral conditions. The category that a crime falls into is important because it affects the elements that must be established to convict a person of committing a particular crime. Dec 03, 2008 mayola williams sued philip morris alleging negligence, strict product liability, and fraud. Strict liability crimes do not include a mental state as an element of the offense. Strict liability offences are primarily regulatory offences aimed at businesses in relation to health and safety. Strict liability is generally very rare in american jurisprudence. How strict liability works in product liability cases. Strict liability for car drivers in accidents involving.
It means that you are liable for an act regardless of mens rea guilty mind, in latin, or negligence. Strict liability which crimes are crimes of strict liability. Strict liability is a legal term referring to the holding of an individual or entity liable for damages or losses, without having to prove carelessness or mistake. Criminal liability is established, prima facie, when a person enters or remains in a declared area. Strict liability is a legal concept that makes it easier for consumers to obtain compensation from designers, manufacturers, or sellers of defective products. Feb 17, 2016 strict liability is a legal concept that makes it easier for consumers to obtain compensation from designers, manufacturers, or sellers of defective products. Such a claim relies, not on wrongdoing, but on the inherent hazards of the situation or. The elements of strict liability in criminal law are simple. The doctrine is the natural outgrowth of justice cardozos perceptive and justifiably ac. In particular cases, a fence can be legally required.
With respect to whether special exceptions should be made in products liability cases for certain categories of plaintiff conduct, see comment d. While a retaining wall can serve as the footing for a fence, the wall itself is. Injury inflicted by animals lawshelf educational media. Product liability cases involving manufacturing defects. The harm could be caused either by a design defect or by the corporation withholding an important warning, such as that their goods contain a hazardous material.
In addition, and as an exception to the general law of negligence, owners of land. Generally, an individual has no right to destroy a fence that is situated in another mans property. Many courts have held that a person who suffers economic loss must resort to warranty law. Laws that impose strict or absolute liability alrc.
For, as the commission rightly stresses, cover under a vehicles compulsory insurance does not prejudge the civil liability of the pedestrian or cyclist or the level of awards for damages in a specific. Strict liability crimes are crimes which require no proof of mens rea in relation to one or more aspects of the actus reus. Strict liability also applies in tort law cases, most often against companies that manufacture products that harm people in some way. Know your rights when you have a fence war with your neighbours. Like it or not, the intention is to shift risk away from customers and to those in the chain of distribution who, theoretically at. Strict liability public policy is that someone must pay. At trial, the court rejected philip morriss request for a jury instruction on punitive damages which stated that philip morris could not be punished for harms suffered by nonparties. The court seems to have been inconsistent in its use of terminology in. Act, it should have regard to all the circumstances of the case including. In keeping with the principle of linking liability with fault, a plaintiffs ability to recover in a strict products liability case should not be unaffected by the extent. The divisional court interpreted s as creating an offence of strict liability since it was itself silent as to mens rea, whereas other offences under the same act expressly required proof of knowledge on the part of the defendant. In nuisance cases involving strict liability, the defendants actions are not those of an ordinary person. Finally, many states have adopted the restatement second of torts on strict liability, so case law from other jurisdictions, while not binding, may be especially persuasive to a local court.
The formulation of strict liability, though, is limited to physical harm. In such defective product cases, an injured person only needs to prove a few strict product liability elements. In strict liability cases where riskutility is at issue, the jury should consider the following factors. We have created easy to follow instructions for you whether youre on iphone ipad or an. Torts liability for damage caused by trespassing cattle. Also, certain defenses are unavailable for strict liability offenses. Plaintiff sued jon batteen and cindy batteen defendants in negligence and in strict liability. In these cases, details of the retaining wall for the excavation or fill must be. Apr 15, 2016 related strict liability principles also may apply to products liability and even certain crimes.
Supreme court incorporated strict product liability into admiralty law. Chapter 6 strict liability overview notwithstanding the laws general insistence that the state prove the defendant had a mens rea, in a very few instances courts interpret statutes that have no mens rea words as allowing criminal liability to be imposed even though the defendant had no mens rea even tortious negligence with regard to one or more material elements of the offense. Supreme court is expected to decide in 2015 whether to tackle genericdrug makers liability for failing to update warning labels, while the general motors co. Whether strict liability is applied in cases involving harm caused by animals depends on whether the harm was inflicted by a domestic animal or a wild animal, and whether or not the injury was the result of the animals natural dangerous propensities or an abnormal dangerous propensity. Florida strict liability law governs wrongful death. Importantly, maryland courts and courts throughout the nation have asserted that the location of the activity is the most important factor of the sixfactor test. He was advised that this was a strict liability offence and his belief that she was 15 was irrelevant. The apportionment of responsibility principles as they have developed in each jurisdiction should be applied to products liability cases. In keeping with the principle of linking liability with fault, a plaintiffs ability to recover in a strict products liability case should not be unaffected by the extent to which his injuries result from his own fault. Strict product liability cases focus on the product itself, not the behavior of the manufacturer or vendor. Under the restatement third there are three categories of animals in strict liability.
Strict liability avoids some negligence traps, too. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that makes a person or company responsible for their actions or products which cause damages regardless of any intent or negligence on their part. It is written for the undergraduate legal studies, paralegal and business law student. Bc658648, sets forth claims for general negligence and products liability in connection with an iphone 6 that exploded in the. By now, we all have some idea what the legal term, strict liability means. The offence is committed when a man has sexual intercourse with a girl under the age of. Cell phone product liability lawsuits seek punitive damages. Aug 08, 2017 strict liability in criminal cases exist in oklahoma. We are working closely with a law professor and anticipate that other criminal defense attorney organizations will join our brief.
930 521 172 377 115 495 603 1056 488 1380 391 1104 172 1043 1436 319 1537 225 1425 945 965 989 517 743 365 847 459 605 275 780 1326 15 366 1074 809 1061